Share this topic:
MW3 Multiplayer Review
#10
Posted 10 November 2011 - 07:43 AM
7/10 imo graphics are rubbish, maps are rubbish online. Guns are overpowered and lag is a huge issue. Weapons are good bar being overpowered and bar that i like nothing else.
#12
Posted 10 November 2011 - 09:14 PM
Dan, on 07 November 2011 - 09:35 AM, said:
Post your review for the multiplayer aspect of MW3.
Check out this review I wrote for Padinga.com:
http://padinga.com/2...-damn-its-ugly/
#13
Posted 12 November 2011 - 11:12 AM
I think it can be summed up by saying that this game is a fixed version of mw2 with new maps. This is a generic COD game IMO.
#14
Posted 13 November 2011 - 07:41 AM
Yes the multiplayee is great if ur able to play online. But for those of us that live in an area where internet is not available, the multiplayer sucks! Why in the hell is there not a cpu patch for mw3 like there was for black ops? Activision could learn something from treyarch!
#15
Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:07 PM
Miek920, on 09 November 2011 - 02:00 PM, said:
I think its amazing because there is no noobtubing happening online and there is barely any camping spots that you can get loads of kills with, also the point streak system is brilliant because it gives objective capturers like me a chance to actually hit the high point streaks, rather than just the odd UAV
Great job IW,SHG,RS
I'm not sure who you've been playing with but I see camping in every lobby and noobtubing in at least 1-2 lobbies a day.
Regardless mw3 is awesome, but i miss unlimited sprint and teleporting commando lunges in mw2.
#16
Posted 15 November 2011 - 04:14 PM
tavish1982, on 10 November 2011 - 07:43 AM, said:
7/10 imo graphics are rubbish, maps are rubbish online. Guns are overpowered and lag is a huge issue. Weapons are good bar being overpowered and bar that i like nothing else.
The graphics are awesome. The maps are great, and if you think a gun is overpowered then use it! It sounds like you are venting from some bad experiences. It happens to all of us when we start.
#17
Posted 26 November 2011 - 01:33 AM
Dan, on 07 November 2011 - 09:35 AM, said:
Post your review for the multiplayer aspect of MW3.
This game is the biggest dissapointment I have seen in the Call of Duty Series. Spawning infront of the enemy all the time. In one game alone, I was spawned infront of an enemy 12 times in one game. (I was 19 and 13) My score should have been 10 times better. Lags so much it is terrible. (I have a T-1 at home) Emptying a full clip into an enemy and they kill me with a single shot. This is a joke. I have watched the game replays on numerous occassions and find the same thing over and over with all the players, you make a good shot and get killed by your opponent with a single shot. This is rediculous. I looked at a clip that a player on my team hit the enemy with atleast a half a clip in the head and the enemy killed him with a shot in the foot???? come on... The balance of the shooting to kill is WAYYYYYY off. In modern warfare 2, If I got killed I knew I was either outgunned or was legitamtely beat. When I play this knock off, I feel cheated almost every time I get killed. The developers say they eliminated most of the camping spots in the new maps. They are just like the politicians of today, they listen to the whining of the small few and do what ever they can to please them. Camping is PART of warfare, part of strategy and part of the game. By doing this, they have taken an element out of the game that makes it competitative for ALL. They should have left it alone. by the way, I dislike campers just as much as the next guy, but it is part of the game. I have read the good reviews and I have read the bad reviews. Everyone has their opinion and mine is that this game is well below the standards of the Call of duty series. I feel that people who give this game a good review are blinded or not experienced enough in the game to know the difference and do not understand how much they are really missing out of what this game should have been.
There is SOOO much more wrong with the multiplayer version of this game that it would take 30 pages to even come close to completing and I won't bore you with that. Try this, Play MW3 for a week straight, then play MW2 for a week straight and you will see a definate difference. Don't take my word for it, try it and view those games after you play them and you will see what I and many others are frustrated and pissed off about.
#18
Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:16 PM
I must agree with most of you guys, this is going to suck about 1000 hours out of the next year for me. There are a lot of similarities to MW2 but for me that is a good thing. There are plenty of improvements to a game that was already great. 9/10 imho.
XB Live: xIRISHxREAP3Rx
Join Us - Gas_Mask_Army
XB Live: xIRISHxREAP3Rx
Join Us - Gas_Mask_Army


Help














