Help
Share this topic:
mw3 Or Battlefield?
#2
De3d3Ye 
- [S||G]
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 90
- Joined: 27-December 11
- Points: 405
Posted 16 January 2012 - 11:52 AM
I feel that MW3 destroys Battlefield in every aspect except for reality. Battlefield is harder and requires more experience while MW3 requires not much.
Also Battlefield graphics kinda suck to me so thats another reason i don't/will never play it.
MW3 = #1
MW2 = #2
Battlefield #3 (maybe)
Also Battlefield graphics kinda suck to me so thats another reason i don't/will never play it.
MW3 = #1
MW2 = #2
Battlefield #3 (maybe)
#3
Gibelini
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 1,531
- Joined: 11-August 11
- Points: 3,340
- LocationThe Netherlands
Posted 16 January 2012 - 12:18 PM
De3d3Ye, on 16 January 2012 - 11:52 AM, said:
I feel that MW3 destroys Battlefield in every aspect except for reality. Battlefield is harder and requires more experience while MW3 requires not much.
Also Battlefield graphics kinda suck to me so thats another reason i don't/will never play it.
MW3 = #1
MW2 = #2
Battlefield #3 (maybe)
Also Battlefield graphics kinda suck to me so thats another reason i don't/will never play it.
MW3 = #1
MW2 = #2
Battlefield #3 (maybe)
Wait what? BF3 graphics suck?
#4
horror4009
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 26-December 11
- Points: 2,200
Posted 16 January 2012 - 12:37 PM
MW3 is better. Hands down.
#5
TheOmegaLegacy
- The Omega Legacy
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 1,433
- Joined: 02-January 11
- Points: 6,865
- LocationLondon, United Kingdom
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:29 PM
Battlefield 3 is much better,
- a lot less frustrating.
- the game isn't dominated by two or three guns, its mostly about the player and not the gun.
- the games last much longer which allows you to actually do stuff.
- a lot more realistic.
- teamwork is crucial and you need to support your fellow team members like dropping ammunition boxes.
- although some weapons are overpowered, the variety and diversity suppressed them.
- map packs include weapons and vehicles.
- games have very diverse and interesting things to do.
- you don't finish ranking up in a matter of weeks.
- selective fire modes is very good.
- BF3 is original.
I could go on all night but I can't be bothered, seriously, MW3 sucks compared to BF3 simply because MW3 is dominated by people who don't give a toss about their team mates and just go for either 'good kills' or 'high K/D'... its all about the gun while in BF3 its mainly your tactics.
- a lot less frustrating.
- the game isn't dominated by two or three guns, its mostly about the player and not the gun.
- the games last much longer which allows you to actually do stuff.
- a lot more realistic.
- teamwork is crucial and you need to support your fellow team members like dropping ammunition boxes.
- although some weapons are overpowered, the variety and diversity suppressed them.
- map packs include weapons and vehicles.
- games have very diverse and interesting things to do.
- you don't finish ranking up in a matter of weeks.
- selective fire modes is very good.
- BF3 is original.
I could go on all night but I can't be bothered, seriously, MW3 sucks compared to BF3 simply because MW3 is dominated by people who don't give a toss about their team mates and just go for either 'good kills' or 'high K/D'... its all about the gun while in BF3 its mainly your tactics.
#6
ProFishman
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 1,503
- Joined: 29-November 11
- Points: 4,975
Posted 16 January 2012 - 01:35 PM
^I completely agree with your post
I have played both and BF3 wins any day
It is just generally a more fun experience, when your team is losing in MW3 it is just sooo frustrating, usually its cos your teammates arnt playing objectives, trying to stupidly rush in and lone wolf and the enemy team just camps with some nooby try hard weapon.
On BF3, when you starting losing, you can regroup with your squad, try something different, use vehicles to support you and when you die it just makes you want to try even harder
I have played both and BF3 wins any day
It is just generally a more fun experience, when your team is losing in MW3 it is just sooo frustrating, usually its cos your teammates arnt playing objectives, trying to stupidly rush in and lone wolf and the enemy team just camps with some nooby try hard weapon.
On BF3, when you starting losing, you can regroup with your squad, try something different, use vehicles to support you and when you die it just makes you want to try even harder
#7
horror4009
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 456
- Joined: 26-December 11
- Points: 2,200
Posted 16 January 2012 - 02:07 PM
well with the ways you guys are talking, I might need to give BF3 another try.
#8
ProFishman
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 1,503
- Joined: 29-November 11
- Points: 4,975
Posted 16 January 2012 - 02:36 PM
Lol you totally should
#9
Aervid
- Advanced Member
-
- Group: Members*
- Posts: 3,242
- Joined: 01-May 11
- Points: 3,830
Posted 16 January 2012 - 03:44 PM
TheOmegaLegacy, on 16 January 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:
Battlefield 3 is much better,
- a lot less frustrating.
- the game isn't dominated by two or three guns, its mostly about the player and not the gun.
- the games last much longer which allows you to actually do stuff.
- a lot more realistic.
- teamwork is crucial and you need to support your fellow team members like dropping ammunition boxes.
- although some weapons are overpowered, the variety and diversity suppressed them.
- map packs include weapons and vehicles.
- games have very diverse and interesting things to do.
- you don't finish ranking up in a matter of weeks.
- selective fire modes is very good.
- BF3 is original.
I could go on all night but I can't be bothered, seriously, MW3 sucks compared to BF3 simply because MW3 is dominated by people who don't give a toss about their team mates and just go for either 'good kills' or 'high K/D'... its all about the gun while in BF3 its mainly your tactics.
- a lot less frustrating.
- the game isn't dominated by two or three guns, its mostly about the player and not the gun.
- the games last much longer which allows you to actually do stuff.
- a lot more realistic.
- teamwork is crucial and you need to support your fellow team members like dropping ammunition boxes.
- although some weapons are overpowered, the variety and diversity suppressed them.
- map packs include weapons and vehicles.
- games have very diverse and interesting things to do.
- you don't finish ranking up in a matter of weeks.
- selective fire modes is very good.
- BF3 is original.
I could go on all night but I can't be bothered, seriously, MW3 sucks compared to BF3 simply because MW3 is dominated by people who don't give a toss about their team mates and just go for either 'good kills' or 'high K/D'... its all about the gun while in BF3 its mainly your tactics.
couldn't have said it better my self, though I don't think MW3 completely sucks. It's just not fun nor exciting to play it and also it's just not comparable to BF3. Not even close.